URPG PokéMafia II (GAME OVER - MAFIA WINS)

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

:boom: **could have

No Lynch

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

no lynch

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

how do you get a picture?

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Well we're basically boned, Now the mafia just pick us off one by one, unless there are some cool, explodey roles?
NO LYNCH

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

At this point, just saying that something isnt a valid argument doesn't make it not one. I'm still unconvinced that any of you aren't Mafia. At this point, believing people is what has gotten us in the predicament. And, stop with trying to equate my reasonings to paranoia. That is what we all should be feeling right now; I at least back mine with reasonings.

Having a leader has done nothing but make this all difficult for us. We should all work together to figure this stuff out, not blindly follow somebody.

People should be more active, or else we will forever blindly believe whatever anyone has to say. We need to work together to figure this out.

And Scourge, that statement was either said in the only chat we share, or quoted by somebody in a different chat. The quoting is the only thing that let me know that there was a chat for this game and that it was exclusive to an extent. That chat is what I assume the inner circle is.

You all do bring up a good point about WTP though. The role he did claim in this chat seems to be that of Turtwig's. That is rather shady, but I kind of doubt it now. You all seem to want to divert any attentions from yourselves and blame WTP. In my mind that raises more questions than anything.

Anyways, why exactly are we No Lynching? We don't get any benefits from it without inspector. It only lets the Mafia get another kill. If anything, whoever started the no lynch train should be looked at.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

1. No one has called you paranoid. Most have rather agreed with the basics of your suspicions. I've just pointed out faults with your reasoning and things that you overlooked.

2. I wouldn't say we've had any genuine leadership, beyond Pidge. Just a series of game-based miscommunications and information fests. EDIT: NO OFFENSE KETA, BUT C'MON. Anyway, the point there, which I forgot to tack on: yes, I agree with you. People need to be getting more into the game, or we're gonna lose. Any leadership has been derailed, and is clearly not effective.

3. Chat in question: Pidge invited online every player who had voted "lynch Pidge" or hadn't yet voted. There were roughly 12 people, because that's who was online. The conversation lasted about fifteen minutes. At the end of it, Pidge Godkilled himself. The chat has not resumed, to my knowledge. You can ask around; people will corroborate.

4. We're voting "no lynch" because every single lynch so far has been of a villager (save the first)... It's not exactly unreasonable to be paranoid about lynching people without base. So we wait for reason. Any encouragement to lynch, at this point, is suspect.

5. IM me. I can screenshot my role. Off-forum screenshots aren't banned.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Nope, it wouldn't. Tried ignoring him, he started breathing down my neck. He approached me on AIM looking for my role. You see someone coming at you like that, asking for your role, when you're not even sure if they aren't maf, (This was Night 0, btw. Before anyone had a chance to say anything.) you get suspicious of them, and give them anything just to get them to leave you alone. Especially if you're trying to do something and they're bothering you. I was working on a school paper I needed to type up when he started bothering me. And I haven't been active because I haven't had anything to contribute. I know no one's roles, and listen to whoever has the best argument and facts for who to lynch.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

If you're talking about that chat you, me + a bunch of other peeps were in, then yes, it happened. Though it lasted for more than fifteen minutes. Lot of accusations, lot of talk and some screenshots floating around.


I vote No Lynch. I'd like to lynch someone, anyone, but randomly picking a person isn't a good way to go about doing things. Odds are that we'll pick a villager

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

I'll vote No Lynch

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

One of the things that i have always found wierd is the fact that some 'villagers' didnt want Pidge to live if he had so much information. A leader of the villagers with a large amount of information and could be protected at night by the nurse (practically invicible, apart from being lynched) meaned that the villagers were in the driving seat and could pick off suspicious individuals. How could villagers NOT want that? Sure you had your suspicions of Pidge being mafia as he was so 'aggressive', but surely it was better to see him incriminate himself as he ordered the villagers lynch a villager?

As such, i Vote Jokester Jesse

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Neonsands is being a dumbass trying to stay in character of paranoid gun owner. Almost everything you have posted in your last post has been maf-like. Why would we kill? Risk the life of the bodyguard? Risk the life of our hooker? Risk the life of our Tracker? Risk the life of our Vigilante? Risk the life of our Hunter? Risk the Mayor? We have 22 remaining players so we have a 6/22 chance of hitting a Village "Power" role and around a (4-8)/22 Chance of hitting Mafia/Rogue (Assuming their numbers are in between 4 and 8). So if you want to lynch BLINDLY go ahead but just know if people do decide to follow you and you are wrong you will be lynched.​

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Yeah your right, it was SOOOO safe for us to keep pidge, even though, IF HE WAS MAF as we thought, he had everyones roles, even the people with good roles, he could probably use his knowledge and wisdom of the game, to forge ANY role to make it look maf when he could have actually been maf. But go ahead and think what you will.

As a Counter Vote Mubz.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Fair enough, I just hope we don't lose someone else important.
Vote No Lynch.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Actually, im a nub and dont pay attention to things (unrelated to posts in this thread), Changing Vote to No Lynch

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

I like Ketamine's math, so No Lynch.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

non lynch si vous plait (i suck at french)

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

Voting no lynch cause we have a bandwagon

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 4]

No Lynch.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [NIGHT 4]

Sorry, I've gotta do this a bit early cause I'm not present a few minutes from now.

Anyways, NO LYNCH is almost unanimous.

There was no lynch today!

NIGHT 4 ends on 2/13/11.

Btw, I'm more strictly hunting down ghostspeakers.

Any evidence=immediate Godkill and an infraction for the dead from a mod.

 

Re: URPG PokéMafia II [DAY 5]

Death has come for the lovely Gardevoir.

Sweet Gardevoir

Lover and Protector of the village

Dead.

DAY 5 ends at 0:00 GMT-5 2/15/11

NO GHOSTSPEAKING