1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If your account is currently registered using an @aol.com, @comcast.net or @verizon.net email address, you should change this to another email address. These providers have been rejecting all emails from @bulbagarden.net email addresses, preventing user registrations, and thread/conversation notifications. If you have been impacted by this issue and are currently having trouble logging into your account, please contact us via the link at the bottom right hand of the forum home, and we'll try to sort things out for you as soon as possible.
  3. Bulbagarden has launched a new public Discord server. Click Here!

Generation Clauses LOOKING FOR YOUR OPINIONS

Discussion in 'Trainer's Court' started by Ash K., Mar 23, 2012.

Voter count: 12
?

How do you think this should work (if at all)?

  1. This idea is stupid. Don't use it at all.

    9 vote(s)
    75.0%
  2. Suggestion 1.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Suggestion 2.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Suggestion 3.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Suggestion 4.

    3 vote(s)
    25.0%
  6. I have a better/different idea of how this should work.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. KidBeano

    KidBeano CAPS

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    6
    Except Kanto was in both Gen I and Gen II. So, using that logic, we use both clauses at the same time? PARADOX, BRAIN IMPLODES.
     
  2. We Taste Pies...

    We Taste Pies... pikachu in a highchair

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just noticed this WASN'T in the trainer's court @[email protected]

    Brb, moving this thread.
     
  3. SLCalamity

    SLCalamity TYKG

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    3
    And III...

    ...and IV :O
     
  4. WebMaster

    WebMaster Beast Mode!!!

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think these clauses are needed tbh. GSC and RSE already do a sufficient job of removing aspects of future generations like the physical special split. Prohibiting mons and moves would put too much restrictions imo
     
  5. Fierce Deity

    Fierce Deity Termina

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    68
    Or you could do special rule battles saying what generation Pokemon to use.

    >extra unnecessary stuff explained as clause to look professional