1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If your account is currently registered using an @aol.com, @comcast.net or @verizon.net email address, you should change this to another email address. These providers have been rejecting all emails from @bulbagarden.net email addresses, preventing user registrations, and thread/conversation notifications. If you have been impacted by this issue and are currently having trouble logging into your account, please contact us via the link at the bottom right hand of the forum home, and we'll try to sort things out for you as soon as possible.
  3. Bulbagarden has launched a new public Discord server. Click Here!

Phaze Clause

Discussion in 'Trainer's Court' started by Captain Dude, Jul 7, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Captain Dude

    Captain Dude Made in America

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    2
    You're saying its deadly with fast pokemon. The amount of fast pokemon that learn Sand-Attack is less than the amount of pokemon that learn Dragon Tail and Circle Throw. (You brought up a point of these moves being relatively rare)

    You can always Taunt, Sub, use one of the never miss moves. There's plenty of Pokemon with abilities related to accuracy.

    I'm done arguing though, since no one else wants the clause.
     
  2. Monbrey

    Monbrey Pyromaniac

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,305
    Likes Received:
    450
    I've always been favour of some way of protecting people from having basics dragged out in D/P rulesets, but I still wouldn't support a clause that totally bans the move, sorry.

    The fact that they are a reduced priority makes them counterable. Roar and Whirlwind can be taunted. Dragon Tail and Vital Throw can be subbed against.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.