1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If your account is currently registered using an @aol.com, @comcast.net or @verizon.net email address, you should change this to another email address. These providers have been rejecting all emails from @bulbagarden.net email addresses, preventing user registrations, and thread/conversation notifications. If you have been impacted by this issue and are currently having trouble logging into your account, please contact us via the link at the bottom right hand of the forum home, and we'll try to sort things out for you as soon as possible.
  3. Bulbagarden has launched a new public Discord server. Click Here!

Basics Refbot

Discussion in 'Trainer's Court' started by Pman, Feb 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pman

    Pman Insane Particle Collider

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0


    The spoiler contains a chat about writing a program to ref for us.

    If anybody has the time and ability, maybe they could.

    I can foresee too many problem but hey.
     
  2. Synthesis

    Synthesis ._.

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,133
    Likes Received:
    155
    Doubt it will ever happen. inb4 refs dun liek the idea ^_^
     
  3. Team Evolution

    Team Evolution WATER MASTER!

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2010
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    3
    I can't remember who but someone else already stated this idea a long time ago, it got shot down due to things like cheating ect.
     
  4. Pman

    Pman Insane Particle Collider

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    I mentioned that in the spoiler, its just too easy to cheat and synth, i would only have it for basics cos most refs don't like those anyway.
     
  5. Buzzer

    Buzzer New Member

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    OMG WUT ARE U DOIN TRYIN' TO TAKE MA MONEH.

    Anyway, I do like the idea, but I feel it just wouldn't be practical given the cast amount of variety within URPG, you would have to program every move, and OK the pokemon aren't such a problem as the ref calc has that. And as mentioned, it would be hard to avoid cheating/abuse of the system.

    Where as with refs, they have to at least ref every battle and it is third party to ensure fairness.

    As for refs not liking basics, there are some who don't care and like the easy money. The reason they get annoying is because people staaall in them.
     
  6. Monbrey

    Monbrey Pyromaniac

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,305
    Likes Received:
    450
    I could write one for IRC easily enough, although time consuming.

    A) Payment: Either I get paid for all battles the refbot does because I made it, or no-one does really. Not a fair system for referees either way.

    B) Cheating: Half of the referee's job is acting as an unbiased third party. The ref is the match offical. He checks stats to see if you've learnt the moves, if you even have the Pokemon. Even with the entire Ultra-dex programming into a bot, it has no idea if YOUR Pokemon knows the moves or not. A refbot cannot make human decisions.

    C) Usability: A bot could only run on set commands. Everything would need to be carried out in format. Rules EXACTLY in format so it knew what it was reffing. Something a simple as writing "DP" instead of "D/P/Pt" or "Frz Clause" instead of "Freeze Clause" would break it. Moves typed EXACTLY as it knows them. For example: "Thunder Wave". It wont know what "Thunderwave" or "Twave" is. The reffing process itself is not all calculator input/output. A robot cannot mirror the human aspect needed. If you've used Brick Break constantly, I know what you mean when you say BB. Bot doesnt.

    D) Logging: I, personally, hate it when other people log for me. I think the only time in the 1400 or so posts in my ref log someone else has posted is when I fell asleep and Xali paid me in full anyway. That was ok, since he actually knows how to post a log. ^.^

    But what, the refbot has its own log? If anyone can post there, what stops me from posting 10 basics and claiming my evolved Pokemon? Or posting as many perma-basic battles as I like? Even if the refbot has internal logging which I/the creator could check, if someone simply puts two accounts in the IRC channel, it can for all intensive purposes appear to be a legit battle. A human might know its fake, but a bot wont.

    Now I know the URPG runs on a honour system, so in part we have to trust our members. What I don't trust is programmable machines. If I can tell it what to do, other people can work out how to also.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  7. Dinobot

    Dinobot Leader of the Autobots

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    6,263
    Likes Received:
    10
    I agree with said above. Also, same feeling for basics. I don't mind doing them, just not for stallers.
     
  8. Mubz

    Mubz Unregistered user

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,141
    Likes Received:
    2
    TRYNA TAKE MA MONEY HUH??! *Grabs Shotgun*

    Monbrey and Buzzer pretty much said why it isnt a practical idea. Also most refs will ref basics as long as you dont be stupid and stall or acc/evasion hax. Personally im fine with it if you wanna set up one turn then go on to 2HKO or OHKO, jus not when people know they are gonna lose but spam Double Team
     
  9. Monbrey

    Monbrey Pyromaniac

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,305
    Likes Received:
    450
    I'd probably hardcode a ragequit into the ref bot for that anyway. XD

    if(move == double_team)
    {
    ragequit();
    }
     
  10. Ataro

    Ataro URPG Official

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    5,011
    Likes Received:
    114
    I think one of the bigger problems with this idea is because even if there is a system in place, URPG would no longer be special. URPG will be just another online simulator like Shoddy or Pokemon Online, and there is really nothing special on URPG anymore other than the fact that you start on a 'journey'. And, what would happen if such a system is being put into place? Where do people get their income from?

    I believe part of the reason URPG is rather successful is because of the effort-and-reward scheme that URPG plays by. By having people put in effort which helps the community to grow and prosper (eg. reffing battles), they get paid themselves to buy Pokemon and TMs. So not only is reffing something special and exclusive in URPG, it is also reffing that allows people in the URPG to get money which also happens to be the primary way of earning money.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  11. HKim

    HKim Head of the URPG

    Blog Posts:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    102
    Couldn't have said it better myself.

    Also, I thought Ataro was the Refbot.
     
  12. Synthesis

    Synthesis ._.

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,133
    Likes Received:
    155
    HKim, is that another joke? ;D
     
  13. TheEvilDookie

    TheEvilDookie 追放されたバカ

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    0
  14. Pman

    Pman Insane Particle Collider

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    okay, I have a better idea to make basics easier.

    lets call it the "stall Clause"

    Any move that will make the battle take longer (eg. defense boosts, evasion hax) would cause an auto loss.

    We just need to figure out exactly which moves to ban
     
  15. Mubz

    Mubz Unregistered user

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,141
    Likes Received:
    2
    LOL'd at the clause idea. Sorry, but people need to realise that basics arent important and accept it if they are gonna lose them.
     
  16. Haze

    Haze Member

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    2
    Or you could just do a basic battle and suck it up
     
  17. TheEvilDookie

    TheEvilDookie 追放されたバカ

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    0
    this .. and lold
     
  18. Pman

    Pman Insane Particle Collider

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sick of refs ragequitting cos nubs use evasion hax in basics..Evasion stuff is fine in a gym battle, but not in basics where people just want it over and done with.


    That's what I'm getting at, suck it up and lose them...I know of people that won't battle you in basics if they don't think they can win (which is ridiculous).
     
  19. Buzzer

    Buzzer New Member

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    The point is who wants to sit around for half an hour reffing misses for only 500. And most gyms do evasion clause anyway.
     
  20. Ataro

    Ataro URPG Official

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    5,011
    Likes Received:
    114
    I believe we're done here.

    Seriously, if someone is going to stall and take half an hour to complete a basics batttle, and you have an issue with it, you jolly well don't ref or battle for/with them the next time then. Simple. That, or make an agreement with the other battler to make things fast. It's really that easy, there's no need to make things so complex. :s

    *Locked
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.