1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If your account is currently registered using an @aol.com, @comcast.net or @verizon.net email address, you should change this to another email address. These providers have been rejecting all emails from @bulbagarden.net email addresses, preventing user registrations, and thread/conversation notifications. If you have been impacted by this issue and are currently having trouble logging into your account, please contact us via the link at the bottom right hand of the forum home, and we'll try to sort things out for you as soon as possible.
  3. Bulbagarden has launched a new public Discord server. Click Here!

New Rules Regarding Reffing FFAs

Discussion in 'Battles' started by Pidge, Jul 3, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pidge

    Pidge a

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,932
    Likes Received:
    3
    A few fellow staff members, as well as myself, have decided that FFAs have become too lucrative for both the participants and the ref. Additionally, a guideline should exist on what FFA rules are not acceptable. Therefore, please note the following changes.

    A ref may now only ref one Free For All every week. A new week starts when it becomes Sunday according to Greenwich Mean Time.

    Any FFA rule that involves one or more of these is explicitly forbidden, unless the rule is approved by staff members in advance.
    • using Pokemon you do not own
    • battlers using more than one Pokemon at once
    • greatly limiting the use of Substitute, Protect, and/or Detect
    • limiting the use of many moves in general; ex. all Pokemon are permanently affected by Taunt
    • increasing the damage of moves too greatly under common conditions
    • giving a player too great of an advantage or disadvantage in relation to fulfilling a certain condition or due to random chance
    • hidden stat boosts
    • capping stat boosts

    The reasoning of some of these limitations are either due to: a lack of effort to ref in relation to the amount paid, going against fundamental concepts of the URPG and/or FFAs, or complications in logistics.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.